-
August 20th, 2001, 08:37 AM
#21
Inactive Member
philipswales,
I just remember reading the Independents Day section, and Video Daze just stuck out.... basically because I was working in a video shop at the time... and I love Clerks!
its funny the things you remember...?!?!?
------------------
-
August 20th, 2001, 06:05 PM
#22
Inactive Member
Anyone ever see El Mariachi? (of course I'm being sarcastic, you've all seen it... right?) it was shot on film, bullet hits, no sync sound etc. etc. For about $7,000. Shitload of work, but it is possible.
------------------
-
August 20th, 2001, 06:38 PM
#23
Inactive Member
Cube 2?! The only way I could see that being as good as the first is if it took the same scenario but with different people reacting in different ways. And you'd still need a math genius and an idiot sevant.
------------------
"Do it, Doug!"
-
August 21st, 2001, 02:06 AM
#24
Inactive Member
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, helvetica, sans serif">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by adjcahill:
Anyone ever see El Mariachi? (of course I'm being sarcastic, you've all seen it... right?) it was shot on film, bullet hits, no sync sound etc. etc. For about $7,000. Shitload of work, but it is possible.
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Yes, however he had to sacrifice a lot in terms of the quality of acting, lighting, shot selection, etc. It's inevitable that the quality will suffer the more complex the film is, working with such low budgets/resources.
More films set in one location:
-The Haunting (Black and white version)
-Go, Go Second Time Virgin (Japanese film set almost entirely on a rooftop)
-Titanic (Set almost entirely on a very big boat
)
------------------
-
August 21st, 2001, 07:47 PM
#25
Inactive Member
The Clint Eastwood film "The Beguiling" was set all in one house. And "Dirty Harry" was set entirely in San Francisco.
------------------
-
August 21st, 2001, 09:18 PM
#26
Inactive Member
Who cares if Mariachi had to 'suffer' in terms of everything you mentioned - he's an extremely rich successful film-maker as a result.
------------------
-
August 21st, 2001, 09:36 PM
#27
Inactive Member
You're right. Who cares about quality?
------------------
-
August 22nd, 2001, 10:12 AM
#28
Inactive Member
My point is: I liked Mariachi. And it's so fast cut you don't even have a chance to notice some of the shots are out of focus/over exposed.
And yes - who cares about *technical* quality if you have a shit story?
------------------
-
August 22nd, 2001, 10:29 AM
#29
Inactive Member
God damm it, once again that name rodriguez fouls this board
to save writing a book on this follow the links
http://www.hostboard.com/ubb/Forum317/HTML/002734.html
http://www.hostboard.com/ubb/Forum317/HTML/002051.html
------------------
who shoots on DVCAM and is proud of the fact
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Public5ylac/files/
-
August 22nd, 2001, 12:58 PM
#30
Inactive Member
I'm just saying he is a successful film-maker, and as such should be studied for information purposes. A bit like old people - they should be studied to determine what nutrients they can provide us with.
------------------
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks